ASTM F1820

Disassembly forces of modular acetabular devices

Icon of the ASTM F1875 test

ASTM F1875

Fretting corrosion testing of modular implants – Femoral stem-head interface

Icon of the ASTM F2009: Standard Test Method for Determining the Axial Disassembly Force of Taper Connections of Modular Prostheses

ASTM F2009

Modular connection disassembly test

ASTM F2068 (PI-98)

Requirements for femoral prostheses - Metallic implants

ASTM F2345

Femoral head fatigue test

ASTM F2580

Modular stem fatigue test

ASTM F2582

Impingement test

ASTM F2979

Bearing surface characterization of retrieved hard-on-hard hip prostheses

ASTM F2996

FEA non-modular hip femoral stem

ASTM F3018

Guide for assessment of hard-on-hard articulation THR devices

ASTM F3047M

High demand hip wear testing

ASTM F3090

Fatigue test of acetabular devices

ASTM F3446

3D frictional torque measurement of total hip joint prostheses

ASTM F3738

Third-body hip wear test

ISO 11491

Impact resistance femoral heads

ISO 14242-1

Hip wear test

ISO 14242-4

Microseparation test

ISO 21534

Particular requirements for joint replacement implants

Icon of the ISO 21535 test

ISO 21535

Hip range of motion

icon test description

ISO 21535

Specific requirements for hip-joint replacement implants

ISO 7206-1

Classification and designation of dimensions

ISO 7206-10

Femoral head compression test

ISO 7206-12

Deformation test for acetabular shells

ISO 7206-13

Femoral head torsion test

ISO 7206-2

Hip surface analysis

ISO 7206-4

Femoral stem fatigue test

ISO 7206-6

Femoral stem neck fatigue test

ISO 7206-8

Femoral stem fatigue performance requirements

PI-11

Insert compression fatigue / static test

PI-3

Acetabular cup luxation test

PI-58 (ISO 7206-8)

Femoral stem fatigue test

PI-87

FEA non-modular hip femoral stem - neck region

PI-99 (ASTM F2091)

Standard specification for acetabular prostheses

ASTM F1820

Disassembly forces of modular acetabular devices

Normative References

ASTM F1820: Standard Test Method for Determining the Forces for Disassembly of Modular Acetabular Devices

This test method covers three different tests to determine the mechanical strength of the fitting between the acetabular shell and liner.

The push-out test determines the axial locking strength of the acetabular liner within the acetabular shell.
The offset pull-out or lever-out disassembly test determines the resistance of the locking mechanism to edge forces. They could occur when the neck of the femoral stem impinges on the edge of the acetabular liner.
The torque-out test determines the resistance of the locking mechanism against torsional forces.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ASTM F1820 provides comparative test methods for evaluating the attachment strength between the liner and shell of a modular acetabular device. The standard addresses three loading conditions:

  • Axial disassembly or push-out
  • Offset pull-out or lever-out disassembly
  • Torque-out disassembly

These tests characterize different aspects of the locking mechanism. They do not reproduce physiological loading conditions and do not establish a minimum acceptable disassembly force or torque.

Read more…

Purpose of the test
ASTM F1820 assesses the integrity of acetabular liner locking mechanisms under three types of loading:

  • Axial loading along the polar axis
  • Edge-related loading associated with liner impingement
  • Rotational loading of the liner within the shell

The results can support comparisons between designs, sizes, materials, or locking concepts. Implant size and locking mechanism geometry must be considered because both can influence the measured force or torque.

Devices covered by ASTM F1820
The test method applies to modular acetabular devices consisting of an acetabular shell and a separate liner. It covers:

  • Polyethylene and hard-bearing liners
  • Dual mobility and constrained liner applications
  • Locking features incorporated into the shell and liner
  • Designs that use additional locking components, such as rings or screws

The method may not be appropriate for every implant design. The materials, locking principle, component geometry, and intended application should be considered when defining the test program.

Test specimens
The specimens must be representative of implant-quality products. This includes sterilization or thermal processing that could affect material properties or component geometry.

Important specimen requirements include:

  • A minimum of n=5 shell-liner assemblies for each test method
  • Random pairing of shells and liners unless another approach is reported
  • Justification of the sample size when results are used for statistical comparisons
  • Documentation of the device size, materials, and lot information

A partially finished shell or permanent fixture block may replace the complete shell when its internal material, surface finish, locking mechanism, geometry, and manufacturing conditions are identical to those of the finished product.

Assembly conditions
Before testing, the liner is assembled into the shell with a peak force of 2,000 N applied along the polar axis. Alternatively, the assembly method specified in the manufacturer’s surgical technique may be used when it is reported and justified. For polyethylene liners, the same shells may be used for all three evaluations if they remain undamaged and the integrity of the locking mechanism has not been affected.

Axial disassembly or push-out
The axial disassembly test measures the force required to release the liner along the polar axis. The shell is supported continuously without deformation while the liner remains free to disengage. An axial force is applied to the liner through the shell, typically through an opening at the shell apex.

The test determines:

  • The maximum force required to disengage the liner
  • The failure mode of the specimen
  • Whether liner damage occurs before the locking mechanism releases

The displacement rate must not exceed 0.04 mm/s for hard-bearing liners with a taper-locking mechanism or 0.85 mm/s for polyethylene liners. Additional testing or an adapted load applicator may be required if a thin polyethylene liner is punctured or severely damaged before the locking mechanism releases.

Offset pull-out or lever-out disassembly
This evaluation assesses resistance to edge-related loading. Such forces can occur when the femoral neck impinges on the liner rim and tends to lift the opposite edge of the liner from the shell.

The test may use:

  • An offset pull-out arrangement
  • A lever-out arrangement
  • A prepared attachment point in the liner
  • A bonded fixture for suitable hard-bearing liners

The specimen preparation must not interfere with the locking mechanism. The maximum force required to disengage the liner is recorded. When a lever arrangement is used, the measured test-machine force is converted to the force acting on the liner using the lever-arm dimensions.

Torque-out disassembly
The torque-out test evaluates the anti-rotation features of the locking mechanism. The shell and liner are aligned with the torsion axis of the test system, and torque is transferred to the liner through a suitable test interface.

Central test conditions include:

  • A compressive load of no more than 25 N during torque application
  • A maximum torque rate of 6°/s for polyethylene liners
  • A maximum torque rate of 0.05°/s for hard-bearing liners
  • Recording of torque and rotational displacement

The peak torque is reported as the torque-out value. The test normally ends when the torque decreases by more than 10% from the preceding peak.

Results and reporting
The test report includes:

  • Maximum disassembly force or torque for each specimen
  • Failure mode for each valid or invalid test
  • Device designation, dimensions, materials, and lot information
  • Assembly method and relevant test configuration
  • Orientation of the liner and shell when their axes are not coincident
  • Lever dimensions and calculated liner force for lever-out testing

Material failure can occur before the locking mechanism releases, particularly during push-out or offset testing of thin liners. Complete fracture or severe deformation before disassembly generally invalidates the individual test because the locking strength has not been fully measured.

Precise assembly is critical to the success of this test. Any mispositioning while joining the parts can lead to skewed results or inconsistencies. In particular, aligning the polar axis correctly is essential to ensure that the test conditions truly reflect the intended setup. These are not details to leave to chance — this is where expert handling makes all the difference.

Resources

This image shows Dipl. Ing. Christian Findeiss Head of Fatigue Testing & Material Analysis, Head of Vascular Testing at EndoLab

Your contact person

Dipl. Ing. Christian Findeiss

Head of Fatigue Testing & Material Analysis, Head of Vascular Testing