{"id":2602,"date":"2024-08-27T18:09:24","date_gmt":"2024-08-27T16:09:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/endolab.org\/?post_type=hip-implants&#038;p=2602"},"modified":"2026-06-24T17:20:20","modified_gmt":"2026-06-24T15:20:20","slug":"astm-f1875","status":"publish","type":"hip-implants","link":"https:\/\/endolab.org\/de\/hip-implants\/astm-f1875\/","title":{"rendered":"ASTM F1875"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>ASTM F1875:<\/strong> Standard Test Method for Long-Term Fretting Corrosion Testing of Modular Implant Interfaces: Hip Femoral Modular Head-Bore \/ Cone Taper Junctions<br><br>ASTM F1875 describes test, analysis, and characterization methods for evaluating the long-term fretting corrosion behavior of modular hip femoral head-bore and cone taper junctions under cyclic loading in a corrosive environment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The method is intended for comparative testing of final-finished femoral heads in combination with final-finished stems or simulated trunnion specimens. It does not predict in vivo performance. Instead, it provides defined test conditions for comparing fretting and fretting corrosion behavior between different implant designs, material combinations, and construct configurations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Testing is performed under cyclic compressive loading for a minimum of 10 million cycles. After testing, the resulting damage is assessed by visual scoring and, where applicable, by quantitative methods such as metal ion analysis and electrochemical measurements.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">ASTM F1875 also describes a short-term electrochemical screening approach that may be used during design development to compare design parameters, material combinations, or surface treatments, and to support worst-case selection for long-term testing. This screening test is provided as additional, nonmandatory guidance and does not replace the long-term performance evaluation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:49px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-uagb-faq uagb-faq__outer-wrap uagb-block-79dd6eac uagb-faq-icon-row-reverse uagb-faq-layout-accordion uagb-faq-expand-first-true uagb-faq-inactive-other-true uagb-faq__wrap uagb-buttons-layout-wrap uagb-faq-equal-height     \" data-faqtoggle=\"true\" role=\"tablist\"><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@type\":\"FAQPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/endolab.org\\\/de\\\/hip-implants\\\/astm-f1875\\\/\",\"mainEntity\":[{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"When do I need ASTM F1875?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Whenever your THR design includes a modular femoral head\\u2013neck junction, and you need evidence on fretting\\\/fretting-corrosion at the taper interface. It\\u2019s also referenced within <a href=\\\"https:\\\/\\\/endolab.org\\\/hip-implants\\\/iso-21535\\\/\\\" data-type=\\\"hip-implants\\\" data-id=\\\"2815\\\">ISO 21535<\\\/a>\\u2019s normative set.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"What are typical observations for devices tested under ASTM F1875?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Corrosion, discoloration or debris on the taper surfaces and dulling of machine lines as well as particle and ion release into the test fluid.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"What other tests are typically conducted in conjunction with ASTM F1875?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Typical complementary evaluations include static disassembly testing according to <a href=\\\"https:\\\/\\\/endolab.org\\\/hip-implants\\\/iso-7206-10-astm-f2345-pi-14\\\/\\\" data-type=\\\"hip-implants\\\" data-id=\\\"2560\\\">ISO 7206-10<\\\/a> or <a href=\\\"https:\\\/\\\/endolab.org\\\/hip-implants\\\/astm-f-2009\\\/\\\" data-type=\\\"hip-implants\\\" data-id=\\\"2564\\\">ASTM F2009<\\\/a>, visual and optical assessment of the bore and cone taper contact surfaces (Goldberg score), SEM\\\/EDS analysis, and metal ion or particle analysis (<a href=\\\"https:\\\/\\\/endolab.org\\\/implant-testing\\\/particle-analysis\\\/\\\" data-type=\\\"page\\\" data-id=\\\"2054\\\">ASTM F1877 and ASTM F561<\\\/a>) of the test solution.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Is there an acceptance criterion for ASTM F1875?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Yes. According to ASTM F1875-26, the observed or measured fretting corrosion damage of the device under evaluation shall be equivalent to or lower than that of a reference implant.\"}}]}<\/script><div class=\"wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-b1f8e777 \" role=\"tab\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions\">\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M224 416c-8.188 0-16.38-3.125-22.62-9.375l-192-192c-12.5-12.5-12.5-32.75 0-45.25s32.75-12.5 45.25 0L224 338.8l169.4-169.4c12.5-12.5 32.75-12.5 45.25 0s12.5 32.75 0 45.25l-192 192C240.4 412.9 232.2 416 224 416z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M416 352c-8.188 0-16.38-3.125-22.62-9.375L224 173.3l-169.4 169.4c-12.5 12.5-32.75 12.5-45.25 0s-12.5-32.75 0-45.25l192-192c12.5-12.5 32.75-12.5 45.25 0l192 192c12.5 12.5 12.5 32.75 0 45.25C432.4 348.9 424.2 352 416 352z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-question\">When do I need ASTM F1875?<\/span><\/div><div class=\"uagb-faq-content\"><p>Whenever your THR design includes a modular femoral head\u2013neck junction, and you need evidence on fretting\/fretting-corrosion at the taper interface. It\u2019s also referenced within <a href=\"https:\/\/endolab.org\/hip-implants\/iso-21535\/\" data-type=\"hip-implants\" data-id=\"2815\">ISO 21535<\/a>\u2019s normative set.<\/p><\/div><\/div><div class=\"wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-222abba2 \" role=\"tab\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions\">\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M224 416c-8.188 0-16.38-3.125-22.62-9.375l-192-192c-12.5-12.5-12.5-32.75 0-45.25s32.75-12.5 45.25 0L224 338.8l169.4-169.4c12.5-12.5 32.75-12.5 45.25 0s12.5 32.75 0 45.25l-192 192C240.4 412.9 232.2 416 224 416z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M416 352c-8.188 0-16.38-3.125-22.62-9.375L224 173.3l-169.4 169.4c-12.5 12.5-32.75 12.5-45.25 0s-12.5-32.75 0-45.25l192-192c12.5-12.5 32.75-12.5 45.25 0l192 192c12.5 12.5 12.5 32.75 0 45.25C432.4 348.9 424.2 352 416 352z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-question\">What are typical observations for devices tested under ASTM F1875?<\/span><\/div><div class=\"uagb-faq-content\"><p>Corrosion, discoloration or debris on the taper surfaces and dulling of machine lines as well as particle and ion release into the test fluid.<\/p><\/div><\/div><div class=\"wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-5e09c140 \" role=\"tab\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions\">\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M224 416c-8.188 0-16.38-3.125-22.62-9.375l-192-192c-12.5-12.5-12.5-32.75 0-45.25s32.75-12.5 45.25 0L224 338.8l169.4-169.4c12.5-12.5 32.75-12.5 45.25 0s12.5 32.75 0 45.25l-192 192C240.4 412.9 232.2 416 224 416z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M416 352c-8.188 0-16.38-3.125-22.62-9.375L224 173.3l-169.4 169.4c-12.5 12.5-32.75 12.5-45.25 0s-12.5-32.75 0-45.25l192-192c12.5-12.5 32.75-12.5 45.25 0l192 192c12.5 12.5 12.5 32.75 0 45.25C432.4 348.9 424.2 352 416 352z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-question\">What other tests are typically conducted in conjunction with ASTM F1875?<\/span><\/div><div class=\"uagb-faq-content\"><p>Typical complementary evaluations include static disassembly testing according to <a href=\"https:\/\/endolab.org\/hip-implants\/iso-7206-10-astm-f2345-pi-14\/\" data-type=\"hip-implants\" data-id=\"2560\">ISO 7206-10<\/a> or <a href=\"https:\/\/endolab.org\/hip-implants\/astm-f-2009\/\" data-type=\"hip-implants\" data-id=\"2564\">ASTM F2009<\/a>, visual and optical assessment of the bore and cone taper contact surfaces (Goldberg score), SEM\/EDS analysis, and metal ion or particle analysis (<a href=\"https:\/\/endolab.org\/implant-testing\/particle-analysis\/\" data-type=\"page\" data-id=\"2054\">ASTM F1877 and ASTM F561<\/a>) of the test solution.<\/p><\/div><\/div><div class=\"wp-block-uagb-faq-child uagb-faq-child__outer-wrap uagb-faq-item uagb-block-dca2eb48 \" role=\"tab\" tabindex=\"0\"><div class=\"uagb-faq-questions-button uagb-faq-questions\">\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M224 416c-8.188 0-16.38-3.125-22.62-9.375l-192-192c-12.5-12.5-12.5-32.75 0-45.25s32.75-12.5 45.25 0L224 338.8l169.4-169.4c12.5-12.5 32.75-12.5 45.25 0s12.5 32.75 0 45.25l-192 192C240.4 412.9 232.2 416 224 416z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-icon-active uagb-faq-icon-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<svg xmlns=\"https:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" viewBox= \"0 0 448 512\"><path d=\"M416 352c-8.188 0-16.38-3.125-22.62-9.375L224 173.3l-169.4 169.4c-12.5 12.5-32.75 12.5-45.25 0s-12.5-32.75 0-45.25l192-192c12.5-12.5 32.75-12.5 45.25 0l192 192c12.5 12.5 12.5 32.75 0 45.25C432.4 348.9 424.2 352 416 352z\"><\/path><\/svg>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t<span class=\"uagb-question\">Is there an acceptance criterion for ASTM F1875?<\/span><\/div><div class=\"uagb-faq-content\"><p>Yes. According to ASTM F1875-26, the observed or measured fretting corrosion damage of the device under evaluation shall be equivalent to or lower than that of a reference implant.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":true,"_uag_custom_page_level_css":""},"class_list":["post-2602","hip-implants","type-hip-implants","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false,"trp-custom-language-flag":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Theresa Kaddick","author_link":"https:\/\/endolab.org\/de\/author\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"ASTM F1875: Standard Test Method for Long-Term Fretting Corrosion Testing of Modular Implant Interfaces: Hip Femoral Modular Head-Bore \/ Cone Taper Junctions ASTM F1875 describes test, analysis, and characterization methods for evaluating the long-term fretting corrosion behavior of modular hip femoral head-bore and cone taper junctions under cyclic loading in a corrosive environment. The method&hellip;","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/endolab.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/hip-implants\/2602","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/endolab.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/hip-implants"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/endolab.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/hip-implants"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/endolab.org\/de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2602"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}